• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

April 2022, Q6 i)

Hi,
While looking at the Examiner's report for April 2022, Q6 i), I have a doubt on the following -

1. Given the product is a term assurance, prudent mortality assumption should be higher assumptions. How is the following sentence justified -
" The longer-term experience would appear to be in line with the assumptions and the long-term experience is slightly better than the assumption, indicating a degree of prudence which may indicate that there is no need to change the assumption"

2. I do not understand the meaning of assumption here in the following sentence for surrenders . The question is to state if any change to the supervisory valuation assumptions need to be made from the given actual experience and we do not have information on the supervisory valuation numbers. So I am a bit confused here.
The longer-term experience appears to be higher than the assumption.
 
Hi,
While looking at the Examiner's report for April 2022, Q6 i), I have a doubt on the following -

1. Given the product is a term assurance, prudent mortality assumption should be higher assumptions. How is the following sentence justified -
" The longer-term experience would appear to be in line with the assumptions and the long-term experience is slightly better than the assumption, indicating a degree of prudence which may indicate that there is no need to change the assumption"

2. I do not understand the meaning of assumption here in the following sentence for surrenders . The question is to state if any change to the supervisory valuation assumptions need to be made from the given actual experience and we do not have information on the supervisory valuation numbers. So I am a bit confused here.
The longer-term experience appears to be higher than the assumption.
Hi Muskan

The question says:

"The results of the most recent experience investigations for these policies have been
summarised in the table below. The results compare the actual experience across the
whole portfolio over the last year and over the last 5 years, with the equivalent
assumptions used in the supervisory valuation."

So the table gives us the actual rate divided by the valuation assumption rate.

Applying this to your first query, the table tells us that over the last 5 years, the actual mortality rate has been 95% of the valuation assumption. So the valuation assumption is higher than actual experience indicating a degree of prudence.

Now looking at your second query, the table tells us that over the last 5 years the actual surrenders were 105% of the valuation assumption. So the experience is 5% higher than the assumption.

Best wishes

Mark
 
Back
Top