• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Taylor's Theorem - Chapter 10, page 13

B

Benjamin Bickers

Member
Hi All,

I have a question on the Taylor's Theorem that is given in the notes in Chapter 10, page 13 that I was hoping someone might be able to answer.

The theorem is given to the second order in the notes as follows (sorry for the ugly formulas!):

df(xt) = f'(xt)dxt + 1/2f''(xt)(dxt)^2 + …

The reader is then referred to the tables page 3 if unfamiliar with the above theorem. However, the theorem given in the tables looks very different:

f(x+h) = f(x) + hf'(x) + 1/2h^2f''(x) + …

I can't, through renaming variables and moving parts around, get from the first theorem to the second, does anyone know how these two formulas can be reconciled?

Thanks very much!
 
Hi All,

I have a question on the Taylor's Theorem that is given in the notes in Chapter 10, page 13 that I was hoping someone might be able to answer.

The theorem is given to the second order in the notes as follows (sorry for the ugly formulas!):

df(xt) = f'(xt)dxt + 1/2f''(xt)(dxt)^2 + …

The reader is then referred to the tables page 3 if unfamiliar with the above theorem. However, the theorem given in the tables looks very different:

f(x+h) = f(x) + hf'(x) + 1/2h^2f''(x) + …

I can't, through renaming variables and moving parts around, get from the first theorem to the second, does anyone know how these two formulas can be reconciled?

Thanks very much!

let df(x) = f(x+h) - f(x)

then h= dxt in the top formula
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi studier,

Thanks for getting back so quickly!

That was along my line of thinking, however, I don't think we can say that df(xt) = f(xt + dxt) - f(xt).

For example, say f(xt) = xt^2, then the LHS = dxt^2 and RHS = (x+dxt)^2 - xt^2 = d^2.xt^2 + 2dxt^2
Dividing both sides by d gives: LHS = xt^2 and RHS = dxt^2 + 2xt^2
letting d tend to zero gives: LHS = xt^2 and RHS = 2xt^2
which aren't equal - am I missing something obvious here?

Sorry again for the ugly formulas!

Thanks again!
 
Hi,

The below is my reconciliation 'attempt' :).

1. f(x+h) = f(x) + hf'(x) + 1/2h^2f''(x) + …
subtracting f(x)
2. f(x+h) - f(x) = hf'(x) + 1/2h^2f''(x) + ...
dividing by h
3. [f(x+h) - f(x)] / h = f'(x) + 1/2hf''(x) + ...
taking the limit as h tends to 0+
4. df / dh = f’(x) + 1/2dhf''(x) + ...
multiplying by dh
5. df = f’(x)dh + 1/2(dh)^2f''(x) + ... [end of rec].

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
Ah I see - that makes sense - thanks very much Mugono!

Now I just have to get my head around the rest of this stuff!
 
Back
Top