I think this textbook is redundant, there is very little you get from it that isn't in Sweeting, look at the Risk Mitigation chapter for example. Categorising risk Management as Basic, Standard and Best Practise doesn't improve our understanding and it's nothing you can actually use... ...it is possible to understand Risk Management with just Sweeting.
If you scrip it then you don't have to ask questions from it. The point is there is little value adding to your training as a Risk Manager by reading that book. The only thing to take home is the 7 lessons. They can just include that in the CR and then acknowledge him.
Hi V, hope the studying is going good;- It helps me spot the redundant areas and to avoid double work, in the end I can have more time to go through my weak areas and to focus on exam technique and pass. Secondly, just because we writing exams doesn't mean we should optimize our minds under the constraint of "only think about what is likely to increase my chance of a pass", but you can cut down redundancies. We are studying to be RISK PEOPLE!
