• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Option theory S2008 Q7 P(ii)

D

delta_tango

Member
hello

please may I ask for some help with S2008 Q7 P(ii) a - valuation using a risk neutral portfolio :

Q7
"Consider a one-period Binomial model of a stock whose current price is 0 S = 40 . Suppose that:
• over a single period, the stock price can either move up to 60 or down to 30
• the continuously compounded risk-free rate is r = 5% per period


(ii) Calculate the price of a European call option with maturity date in one period and strike price K = 45 using each of the following methods:
(a) by constructing a risk-neutral portfolio"



Specifically the published solution with respect to valuing the option using a risk neutral portfolio states:
"First method: we construct a risk-neutral portfolio with 1 underlying asset and m call options. We choose the value of m such that this portfolio is risk neutral (its value in the upper state and in the lower state at time 1 should coincide). In this case, m = −2"

Can someone please help me understand what "value in the upper state and in the lower state at time 1 should coincide" means in the context of risk neutral

Any help would be appreciated. Pardon any lapse in decorum this is my first post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
delta_tango said:
hello

please may I ask for some help with S2008 Q7 P(ii) a - valuation using a risk neutral portfolio :

Q7
"Consider a one-period Binomial model of a stock whose current price is 0 S = 40 . Suppose that:
• over a single period, the stock price can either move up to 60 or down to 30
• the continuously compounded risk-free rate is r = 5% per period


(ii) Calculate the price of a European call option with maturity date in one period and strike price K = 45 using each of the following methods:
(a) by constructing a risk-neutral portfolio"



Specifically the published solution with respect to valuing the option using a risk neutral portfolio states:
"First method: we construct a risk-neutral portfolio with 1 underlying asset and m call options. We choose the value of m such that this portfolio is risk neutral (its value in the upper state and in the lower state at time 1 should coincide). In this case, m = −2"

Can someone please help me understand what "value in the upper state and in the lower state at time 1 should coincide" means in the context of risk neutral

Any help would be appreciated. Pardon any lapse in decorum this is my first post.
Click to expand...
It means that the value of the portfolio in the next period is known with certainty; i.e. it doesn't matter if the stock price increases or decreases.
 
mugono said:
It means that the value of the portfolio in the next period is known with certainty; i.e. it doesn't matter if the stock price increases or decreases.
Click to expand...

hi Mugono,

Thank for your reply however Im not sure how that implies that 2 calls must be sold in order for the portfolio to be risk neutral. i.e. im not sure how the -2 is calculated.

Any guidance for me?
 
delta_tango said:
hi Mugono,

Thank for your reply however Im not sure how that implies that 2 calls must be sold in order for the portfolio to be risk neutral. i.e. im not sure how the -2 is calculated.

Any guidance for me?
Click to expand...
My advice would be to focus on the underlying concept set out in the core reading here. Correct me if this is outdated but this is based on the argument that holding a fraction (+delta units) of shares and a negative holding of the derivative eliminates delta risk and is therefore equivalent to investing the portfolio in a risk-free asset over the next instant.

I had a quick look at the answer; and saw that the explanation for why m = -2 was (conveniently) not explained :).

The delta of a share is 1; and m is set such that the delta of the portfolio is 0. The delta of an ATM option is 0.5 [technically, this is true where the strike price equals the forward price (i.e. S*exp(r(T-t)) assuming no dividends). It is approximately true when the strike price equals the current share price. I include this here for completeness to possibly enhance your understanding - I suspect it is beyond the syllabus].

Setting m = -2 would suggest that the solution has assumed that the call option used to delta hedge the share is ATM (0.5 x 2 = 1). Stating this as an assumption would, in my view, have made the solution clearer

Aside:
The interest rate used in the original question looks to be too low. At a strike price = 45, the one period instantaneous interest rate should be around 12%. I would have been thrown too :).


It was a tricky question !


Hope the above is helpful.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top