P
ProudActuary
Member
I asked you for details of what research you'd undertaken to make your claim. You ignored this part of my question - why?
-
We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
P
ProudActuary
Member
After all these court cases it is going to be clear to any court that their actions are deliberate and calculated. I can’t see the current executive around for much longer
What is the Executive being deliberate and calculated about?
A
almost_there
Member
I asked you for details of what research you'd undertaken to make your claim. You ignored this part of my question - why?
You said you were sure of something. So show it.
P
ProudActuary
Member
Earlier I asked you to clarify why you were saying that I was suggesting 2=4 which you haven't answered and now you're avoiding answering another question.You said you were sure of something. So show it.
More than happy to link to documents once you answer the questions that I asked you first.
N
Null
Member
It’s the IFOA’s duty to show it. They haven’t done so. You can read it in the judgment.
In fact Mr Cribb has said that many actuarial associations need to pull their socks up and that the IFOA is at the pinnacle of all qualifications.
In fact Mr Cribb has said that many actuarial associations need to pull their socks up and that the IFOA is at the pinnacle of all qualifications.
Is the Chartered Actuary (broadly Associate) designation not an attempt to rebase the equivalence of the Uk syllabus... ie does this not (therefore) render your point mute?The Actuarial Society of Turkey were admitted to the Actuarial Association of Europe since 7th November 2018.
https://actuary.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/AAE-AST-New-Full-Member-PR-11-2018-FINAL.pdf
This means those who qualify with them can get IFoA Fellowship after a year's supervised work experience.
I don't find this fair since CT series & CA1 appears sufficient to cover the AAE syllabus.
N
Null
Member
Is the Chartered Actuary (broadly Associate) designation not an attempt to rebase the equivalence of the Uk syllabus... ie does this not (therefore) render your point mute?
Now we’re getting somewhere. Yes the chartered actuary is an attempt to rebase the qualification. But it hasn’t been implemented yet and it begs the question why the qualification has to be rebased. What will the IFoA do for it’s wrong-doing prior to rebasing the qualification?
The only reason their fixing it is because it’s broken which why people are complaining.
P
ProudActuary
Member
You stated earlier that the IFoA Executive were deliberate and calculated - what are they, in your mind, being deliberate and calculated about?It’s the IFOA’s duty to show it. They haven’t done so. You can read it in the judgment.
In fact Mr Cribb has said that many actuarial associations need to pull their socks up and that the IFOA is at the pinnacle of all qualifications.
N
Null
Member
You stated earlier that the IFoA Executive were deliberate and calculated - what are they, in your mind, being deliberate and calculated about?
You’ll be able to read about it soon...
A
almost_there
Member
Is the Chartered Actuary (broadly Associate) designation not an attempt to rebase the equivalence of the Uk syllabus... ie does this not (therefore) render your point mute?
They've known since at least 2013 that Associateship was good enough for the European MRA and ought to have designated it rather than Fellowship. Very reckless and irresponsible, undermining Fellowship.
A
almost_there
Member
The only reason their fixing it is because it’s broken which why people are complaining.
Exactly. They haven't the decency to fix it upon the initial complaint. They prefer to deploy lawyers to make out nothing is wrong for many months and years. Then at some point they'll fix it and claim it was all their own idea.