Exam ST8 in Sep 2015 provide 2 distinctive questions about model validation and model (factor selection) in question 10 and 11. The summary is: Model (factor) selection - Test score (AIC, BIC, Chi Square, F test) - Hat matrix (score at which log likelihood falls off from optimum solution). ie Steep curvature means the parameters is tightly defined. - Compare model relativity with expert judgment. Ie: draw graph of best estimate of predicted model +- 2stddev to see actual result fall inside the graph - Consistency check with factor and interaction Model validation - Actual against expected - Plot residual - Gain curves - Lift curves With me, the differences between these two are very small. Both using some statistical method to compare between models. Many of the method in model validation can be used in model selection and vice versa. After all it is just the trade off between over fitting and under fitting (ie: Test score AIC can be used in model selection as well). In Kaggle some machine learning practioner is using AIC from both train, validation and test.
True enough. In the exam, I imagine it's worth making the distinction between the two. The marking scheme is likely do the same, and after all it's all about maximising your chances of picking up marks. In practice though, an actuary is likely to use a wide variety of tools to optimise the model and analyse results. At the end of the day, an actuary's job is not particularly to give 'the right answer' but to understand (and communicate) the model results, the uncertainties in the model and the limitations of the methods used.
