• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Chapter 9 (Ito’s Lemma)

Bernadette Pieterse

Active Member
Hello,

In the practice question 8 and 9 (2023 version of notes), both questions have the same formula for the GBM. S_t = exp(mu*t + sigma*Bt)

When applying ito’s lemma the first question uses f=exp(mu*t + sigma*Bt) and gets the partial derivates as mu*St, sigma*St and sigma^2*St. This makes sense to me.

However, the second question uses St=exp(Xt) and gets all the derivatives as St. So it does not take the mu and sigma into account when calculating the partial derivatives.

Why do these questions use different approaches? Are they both fine in the exam?

Thanks in advance.
 
You'll end up with the same answer either way - you can use Taylor's formula on any function you like. I would argue that they're not "different approaches" but, yes, the way Questions 8 and 9 have been answered would be equally valid in the exam,

John
 
Back
Top