• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

qx and aqx (d)

nyaman

Very Active Member
Hi everyone
I seem to understand the difference that the other one is independent when there is only one decrement and the other when there are multiple decrements at play. When can these be assumed to be equal? For example in a pricing situation where you have potential death or surrender at play. Can I just assume they are equal and will this be correct? As I am assuming surrender has no impact on death but death has impact on surrender. Please assist and clarity areas where I might be getting it wrong.
 
Hi Nyaman,

Sorry for the late reply. I think it's all about timing. Typically in the profit testing chapters our assumption is that surrenders can only occur at the end of each year. Hence, during the year itself death is the only decrement acting and hence the independent and dependent probabilities of death are essentially the same. However, the independent and dependent surrender probabilities are not since there might be a 10% chance of surrender at the end of the year (the independent probability) but the dependent probability would be 10% * (1-qx) ie in order for the life to surrender they must have survived mortality during the year. I believe this ties up with your thinking above but just wanting to confirm.

Hope this helps.
Joe
 
Back
Top