• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Exam Question Direction

N_Exam

Very Active Member
Hi Acted Tutors,

The SP2 Sept 2023 exam question 2 is:-
2 (i) Outline the main customer needs that endowment assurance products may fulfil. [3]

A life insurance company is considering introducing a new unit-linked endowment assurance product to replace its existing with-profits endowment product.
(ii) Discuss the likely impact on the life insurance company of making this change. [5]
[Total 8]

For part ii, it asks for "impact" on the company. This made me think the question is not asking for "impacts" just an "impact". So i thought i should talk about one area only, Risk. However, the model solution talks about more than just risk (solution below).
So how should I have read/interpreted part 2ii ?


2ii) Solution:
It may change volumes of new business written by the insurer [½]
as well as the type of policyholders purchasing the business [½]
and the per policy profit margin. [½]
It may reduce the level of capital that the insurer needs to hold for the business [½]
Due to lower guarantee costs / passing more investment risk to the policyholder [½]
and the removal of the need to hold capital for smoothing [½]
providing that the insurer designs the product appropriately. [½]
Any change in risk profile will be slow though, as the existing business will remain. [½]
It will also be possible to limit exposure to early lapses through the product charging structure. [½]
The insurer is still exposed to early deaths and will need to hold capital to support these. [½]
It is possible that competitors have switched to a unit linked basis [½]
So, the insurer may be more in line with the market [½]
but they could have lost a key point of differentiation. [½]
However, if this is the insurer’s first unit linked product, then there will be expenses in making this change. [½]
and significant training of staff [½]
and systems development. [½]
and new marketing / product literature. [½]
Administration costs could also be higher depending on the number of funds. [½]
The company will need to change investment strategy [½]
or may outsource investment management. [½]
If the product is set up with variable charges, then it may be possible for the insurer to increase charges to cover increasing expenses…. [½]
but customer expectations here will be important…. [½]
and depend on information provided at the point of sale. [½]
Customer expectations are likely to be more straightforward for unit linked compared to with profits business. [½]
When the change is made, there may be issues or concerns raised by consumers/ brokers about the loss of the With-profits endowment product. [½]
[Marks available 12½, maximum 5]

Thank you for you replies.
 
Hi Acted Tutors,

The SP2 Sept 2023 exam question 2 is:-
2 (i) Outline the main customer needs that endowment assurance products may fulfil. [3]

A life insurance company is considering introducing a new unit-linked endowment assurance product to replace its existing with-profits endowment product.
(ii) Discuss the likely impact on the life insurance company of making this change. [5]
[Total 8]

For part ii, it asks for "impact" on the company. This made me think the question is not asking for "impacts" just an "impact". So i thought i should talk about one area only, Risk. However, the model solution talks about more than just risk (solution below).
So how should I have read/interpreted part 2ii ?


2ii) Solution:
It may change volumes of new business written by the insurer [½]
as well as the type of policyholders purchasing the business [½]
and the per policy profit margin. [½]
It may reduce the level of capital that the insurer needs to hold for the business [½]
Due to lower guarantee costs / passing more investment risk to the policyholder [½]
and the removal of the need to hold capital for smoothing [½]
providing that the insurer designs the product appropriately. [½]
Any change in risk profile will be slow though, as the existing business will remain. [½]
It will also be possible to limit exposure to early lapses through the product charging structure. [½]
The insurer is still exposed to early deaths and will need to hold capital to support these. [½]
It is possible that competitors have switched to a unit linked basis [½]
So, the insurer may be more in line with the market [½]
but they could have lost a key point of differentiation. [½]
However, if this is the insurer’s first unit linked product, then there will be expenses in making this change. [½]
and significant training of staff [½]
and systems development. [½]
and new marketing / product literature. [½]
Administration costs could also be higher depending on the number of funds. [½]
The company will need to change investment strategy [½]
or may outsource investment management. [½]
If the product is set up with variable charges, then it may be possible for the insurer to increase charges to cover increasing expenses…. [½]
but customer expectations here will be important…. [½]
and depend on information provided at the point of sale. [½]
Customer expectations are likely to be more straightforward for unit linked compared to with profits business. [½]
When the change is made, there may be issues or concerns raised by consumers/ brokers about the loss of the With-profits endowment product. [½]
[Marks available 12½, maximum 5]

Thank you for you replies.

Hi

I think you have answered your own question here. You've realised that your approach was too narrow and you should have covered a wide range of points.

A few thoughts on reading the question. I don't think the word "impact" suggests that you should look at just one thing. I would be expecting to cover the full impact rather than just part of the impact. In general, it is better to cover a wide range of ideas in the exam, rather than covering a single idea in great depth.

Best wishes

Mark
 
Back
Top