Sep 2022 Question 6

Discussion in 'SP7' started by kiki, Sep 8, 2023.

  1. kiki

    kiki Very Active Member

    Hi,

    quick question regarding Q6 in sep 2022 , part (iii) asking about if UPR / URR should be revised .

    I am not quite follow the answer suggested in the " examiners' report" :
    1. for no need to revise UPR / URR
    - " the actual impact from the early WS is at 20% , within the estimate CAT component of URR "

    my question :
    - actual losses is 0.2m , shouldnt the incurred losses compared to earned prem ? should be 40% ( 0.2 / 0.5) ; therefore it is similar to what Cat assumed

    2. for need to revise UPR / URR
    - " the early loss was consider to be material at 20% of GWP , and it is higher than cat portion of URR

    my question :
    - Cat portion of URR = 40% , how can 20% greater than 40% ? or is that mean cat portion of URR between July and Sep is ( 0.5 - 0.25) * 0.4 = 0.1? i am confused

    thank you so much for your time
     
  2. Ian Senator

    Ian Senator ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    I wouldn't read too much into the figures given.
    All they are suggesting is that if the claim is within the cat component assumption, then it may be reasonable to leave UPR/URR alone. Whereas if they think the early claim is a sign of worse things to come, then UPR/URR may need revising. This is all explained further in ASET.
     

Share This Page