Lauren Culligan
Made first post
Hi,
Does anyone have any tips on how best to structure your answer to get the most breadth of answers? When doing exam questions I keep answering the question directly and then feeling stumped on what else to say. For example, in April 2021 Paper 1 Question 8:
A large benefit scheme invests in a wide range of assets. The current property portfolio held by the benefit scheme consists of direct investment in offices, shops and warehouses but not in residential property.
(i) Discuss how the scheme managers could gain exposure to residential property, without making a direct investment.
My immediate answer was pooled property funds, and then I wasn't sure what else could be said. But the marking scheme talks about how marketable, liquid these funds are, lack of control, whether they're open or closed ended, management fees to be paid, etc.
I would never have thought to go into detail on aspects of the funds as the question only asks how can they gain exposure to residential property and not what the characteristics of the suggestion would be.
Is there any particular way I should be thinking about answering questions to ensure I don't lose out on marks for these answers, or is the best solution just to write all info that relates to the initial answer, even if it doesn't feel like you're answering the question?
Thanks!
Does anyone have any tips on how best to structure your answer to get the most breadth of answers? When doing exam questions I keep answering the question directly and then feeling stumped on what else to say. For example, in April 2021 Paper 1 Question 8:
A large benefit scheme invests in a wide range of assets. The current property portfolio held by the benefit scheme consists of direct investment in offices, shops and warehouses but not in residential property.
(i) Discuss how the scheme managers could gain exposure to residential property, without making a direct investment.
My immediate answer was pooled property funds, and then I wasn't sure what else could be said. But the marking scheme talks about how marketable, liquid these funds are, lack of control, whether they're open or closed ended, management fees to be paid, etc.
I would never have thought to go into detail on aspects of the funds as the question only asks how can they gain exposure to residential property and not what the characteristics of the suggestion would be.
Is there any particular way I should be thinking about answering questions to ensure I don't lose out on marks for these answers, or is the best solution just to write all info that relates to the initial answer, even if it doesn't feel like you're answering the question?
Thanks!