Baxter and Rennie

Discussion in 'SP6' started by kimlinski, Nov 28, 2022.

  1. kimlinski

    kimlinski Made first post

    On p.42 of the book how has the formula for q under measure Q arrived at from its P equivalent. Thanks for the hint.


    On p.137 the equation for B(t) has the integral of W(s) but the equation for P(t,T) starts with product sigma(T-t)*W(t), even though the formula for f(t,T) an r(t) both have sigma*(W(t)). Thanks for the intuition.

    Kind regards,

    Szczepan
     
  2. Steve Hales

    Steve Hales ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    Hi
    I think I see what you mean. Let me know if I've not understood you correctly.
    The first term in the definition of \(P(t,T)\) includes \(\int_{t}^{T}\sigma W_t du\). But notice that there's no \(u\) in the integrand, and so we're essentially integrating a constant. Therefore that integral equals \(\sigma(T-t)W_t\).
    Notice that this is not the same as \(\int_{t}^{T}\sigma W_u du\) which depends on the path of the standard Brownian motion rather than its starting value \(W_t\).
     
  3. kimlinski

    kimlinski Made first post

    Thanks Steve, integration is done over the maturity of the bond P(t,T) if that makes sense.

    How about the formula for the q on p.42 I'm struggling to derive the expression, manipulating the formulae shown before.
     
  4. Steve Hales

    Steve Hales ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    The risk-neutral up-step probability \(q\) is chosen so that the share price is expected to grow that the risk-free rate over each time-step. Algebraically this mean:
    \(q\times s_{up} + (1-q)\times s_{down} = s \times exp(r\delta)\)
    Rearranging will result in the page 42 definition for \(q\).
     
  5. kimlinski

    kimlinski Made first post

    Thanks Steve. Should've been more precise in the original question: p.42 has two definitions of the q and itsv the second that gives me headaches. Precisely, it's
    q=(1/2)*(1-((delta*t)^(1/2))*[mju+(1/2)*sigma^2-r]/sigma)
    Thanks in advance
     
  6. Steve Hales

    Steve Hales ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    OK, I see what you mean.
    Start with the definition for \(q\), and replace \(s_{up}\) and \(s_{down}\) with their respective values found on page 41, which leads to:

    \[
    q=\frac{exp(r\delta t)-exp(\mu\delta t - \sigma\sqrt{\delta t})}{exp(\mu\delta t + \sigma\sqrt{\delta t}) - exp(\mu\delta t - \sigma\sqrt{\delta t})}
    \]
    Now use Taylor's approximation in each of the four exponential functions: \(exp(x) \approx 1 + x +\tfrac{1}{2}x^2\).
    This then simplifies (remember that powers of \(\delta t\) higher than 1 go to zero) to the second expression for \(q\) on page 42.
     
    kimlinski likes this.

Share This Page