1. Posts in the subject areas are now being moderated. Please do not post any details about your exam for at least 3 working days. You may not see your post appear for a day or two. See the 'Forum help' thread entitled 'Using forums during exam period' for further information. Wishing you the best of luck with your exams.
    Dismiss Notice

Cost of capital

Discussion in 'SP2' started by Siddharth, Mar 24, 2022.

  1. Siddharth

    Siddharth Made first post

    Hi,
    Could anyone please explain what exactly is cost of capital and how it's being calculated?
     
  2. Sayantani

    Sayantani Very Active Member

    Hi Siddharth,
    I will try to answer this if I may and Mark can correct if I am wrong at any place.
    Reserves are generally backed by safe assets like government bonds earning a low rate of return. While the shareholders require a higher rate of return which will be present in the RDR reflecting the riskiness of the business. If reserves grow at 2% but RDR reflects a return of 8% then 6% is the cost of capital. The cost will increase if the reserves are higher.
    To understand it in another way, think that the shareholders would also want their profits earlier but generally what happens is if reserves grow at 2% and then discounted back at 8% then the profit value decreases for the shareholder or there is deferral in the emergence of profit. So the reserves are getting tied up to earn a lower rate of return rather than being able to earn a higher shareholders rate of return. This is the concept behind the cost of capital.
     
  3. Siddharth

    Siddharth Made first post

    Okay, so as per your example can Cost of Capital be also considered as risk premium since reserves are growing at risk free rate and risk discount rate is the sum of risk free rate and risk premium.
     
  4. Mark Willder

    Mark Willder ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    Hi Sayantani

    Thanks for posting. Yes, your explanation looks spot on.

    Best wishes

    Mark
     
  5. Mark Willder

    Mark Willder ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    Hi Siddharth

    I would stick to the explanation that Sayantani gave in the exam as that is what the examiners will be expecting to see.

    Your alternative explanation would be the same if the insurer was investing entirely in the risk free asset.

    Best wishes

    Mark
     

Share This Page