• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Format of ABS

1495_sc

Ton up Member
Hello- can someone please help in understanding the purpose of format of asset-backed securities (ABS) ? Is there a practical example which I can read about? I presume that investment banks like Goldman Sachs must have this format.

I understand that the ABS is structured in a multi-tranche format instead of a single ABS in order to attract different types of investors but how does it work practically? Investor A would get in touch with Goldman Sachs ,for example, to invest in ABS 1. How is this multi tranche presented to the investor? If bonds worth 1 million are being backed by ABS 1, how is this split between senior debt, mezzanine and residual cashflow?
 
Thank you. I wish I could read the whole PDF and even understand it entirely. The ABS format seems to be applied in reality as well. Technical details of the format is explained to investor. I wonder if this conclusion is correct-

Goldman Sachs (GS) or any other IB will pay the investor X if the underlying bond defaults. Does different formats like mezzanine imply that different types of investors will have to pay different levels of premium to GS based on the formats+amount they invest in and if the underlying bond actually defaults in future, GS will prioritize different formats in a pre-defined order and accordingly pay the investors?
 
That rings true to me, with one caveat. Payments would be made to / from the SPV, not from GS.
 
Back
Top