• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Risk neutral Vs Real world

P

Pulit Chhajer

Member
Risk neutral Vs Real world

Could you please break down the concept of "Risk neutral" and "Real World" using below narrative:

Risk neutral technique is a method to calculate the present value of cashflows by discounting risk-adjusted future cashflows with risk-free rates based. The risk-neutral method assumes no arbitrage and a complete market where there is no arbitrage opportunity and any derivative instruments can be perfectly available in the market. If these conditions hold the mathematical theory ensures that the expected value of the present value of the future cashflows based on a risk-free discount rates and a transformed probability distribution is equivalent to the present value of future cashflow based on adequate discount rates and a real-world probability distribution.

A real-world technique is a method to calculate the present value of cashflows by discounting projected cashflows with risk discount rates. Under this method, projected cashflows are not adjusted for uncertainty risk, which is the risk that the future cash flows can be different from those projected. To reflect the "price” of this uncertainty risk, it is common to set the risk-discount rates higher than risk-free rates. In risk-neutral technique the adjustment for the uncertainty can be consistent with observable market prices of securities
 
Hi,

We can allow for the risk in cashflows in a number of different ways eg

1) Stress the cashflows
2) Stress the interest rate
3) Alter probabilities

In subject CT8/CM2 there's a fairly rigorous proof of a result called the risk-neutral pricing formulae which shows us how we can value derivatives in a risky world: by valuing them as the discounted expected payoff using risk-neutral probabilities. Under risk-neutral probabilities, all risky assets are expected to grow at the risk-free rate. Hence, the name risk-neutral. So we transform the probabilities and then we can use risk-free rates throughout our calculations.

Other assets may be priced or valued by using real-world cashflows and real-world probabilities. For example, you might value a share by coming up with possible future dividend values and associated probabilities and you can multiply payoff * probability * discount factor. As you pay something out now and receive income in the future, ie it's all income that's being discounted, we can allow for uncertainty by increasing the discount rate (known as the risk discount rate). This reduces the expected present value of income and so makes a asset or project appear less attractive. Hence, we'd need an asset/project that produces very high income to continue to appear attractive when we increase the discount rate.

Joe
 
Back
Top