N
newkid
Member
Found the paper very different to previous sittings. Less book work - small calcs that took too much time
Q1: straightforward question
Q2: got caught up with calcs and then decided to skip as not much reward. thought part i) and v) were very similar. This was probably my weakest question.
Q3: Wasn't sure what angle they were looking for in certain parts - i think it went ok, but anyone got examples of questions to ask companies?
Q4: messed the calcs up, so just skipped over but answered the rest.
Q5: For part iii), what were we supposed to say for the strategies, that's not in the question?
Q6: Didn't really understand what they were looking for in part iii) with regard to VaR?
Q7: Didn't feel that this was a question for SP5 - more of a CP1 or maybe SP9 type question - what way were we suppose to answer this - language/time issues/regulation/tax etc?
How did others find the exam? Do we expect high/low pass mark, i think the pass marks have ranged from 54 to 67 over the years.
Q1: straightforward question
Q2: got caught up with calcs and then decided to skip as not much reward. thought part i) and v) were very similar. This was probably my weakest question.
Q3: Wasn't sure what angle they were looking for in certain parts - i think it went ok, but anyone got examples of questions to ask companies?
Q4: messed the calcs up, so just skipped over but answered the rest.
Q5: For part iii), what were we supposed to say for the strategies, that's not in the question?
Q6: Didn't really understand what they were looking for in part iii) with regard to VaR?
Q7: Didn't feel that this was a question for SP5 - more of a CP1 or maybe SP9 type question - what way were we suppose to answer this - language/time issues/regulation/tax etc?
How did others find the exam? Do we expect high/low pass mark, i think the pass marks have ranged from 54 to 67 over the years.