• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

April 2019Q2 vii

U

User 1234

Member
In ASET suggested solution, under the additional points of shareholder transfers, original text is "These also appear to be quite high at around 4% of total claims. Reversionary bonus rates might be relatively high"

I guess I understand the point that majority of the $400 shareholder transfers relates to reversionary bonuses. Because if it were relating to terminal bonus, then the implied terminal bonus rate is almost 32% (=400*9/ 11,200 where 11,200 is the total claims amount).

What I don't follow is that, how can we tell the reversionary bonus rates is high from the given information? I thought, in order to derive the reversionary bonus rate (=400*9 / sum assured), we have to know the sum assured in the denominator?

Thanks a lot in advance for your help.
 
In ASET suggested solution, under the additional points of shareholder transfers, original text is "These also appear to be quite high at around 4% of total claims. Reversionary bonus rates might be relatively high"

I guess I understand the point that majority of the $400 shareholder transfers relates to reversionary bonuses. Because if it were relating to terminal bonus, then the implied terminal bonus rate is almost 32% (=400*9/ 11,200 where 11,200 is the total claims amount).

What I don't follow is that, how can we tell the reversionary bonus rates is high from the given information? I thought, in order to derive the reversionary bonus rate (=400*9 / sum assured), we have to know the sum assured in the denominator?

Thanks a lot in advance for your help.
All this is saying that because it is large (larger than it would be if associated to TB alone) then it will likely be due to high reversionary bonuses. And then if there are high reversionary bonuses then this may imply smaller terminal bonuses.
 
All this is saying that because it is large (larger than it would be if associated to TB alone) then it will likely be due to high reversionary bonuses. And then if there are high reversionary bonuses then this may imply smaller terminal bonuses.
Thanks !!!
 
Back
Top