• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

April 2017 - Question 2i

Z

zuglubuglu

Member
The question asks to identify six different types of buyers of insurers and it has 9 marks. One would expect that there is
  • a mark for listing the type of buyer (say small business) and half a mark for listing why,
  • half a mark for listing the type and a mark why or
  • half a mark for listing the type and half a mark for each reason why.
Yet the marking scheme has tends to award half a mark for listing the type of client and half a mark for listing why, essentially a mark per client. Isn't this misleading ? (Ironic given that the question is about fairness)
 
Thanks, yes, it's April 2017. I'll change the thread title to reflect the correct year.

Each of the points in the solution is short, and not particularly difficult (although obviously that's a matter of opinion!). It's not unreasonable to expect, therefore, each thing you say to be worth half a mark. So, given it asks for 6 things but there are 9 marks available, you might expect half a mark for each buyer, and half a mark for each supporting statement - which means more than one supporting statement for each buyer (noting that there is more to say about some buyers than others). So pretty much the third bullet point in your options above.
 
Back
Top