• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

SP9 M16 pg13 error in Leptokurtic graph

J

Johann

Member
Hi All,
Just a quick question, I think the solution to the question on pg16 of Module 16 is showing the wrong distribution to be Leptokurtic (i.e. it is showing the t-distn with gamma = 1) from my understanding this should be platykurtic compared to the standard normal distribution. Is this correct or am i missing something?

Thanks
Johann
 
Hello Johann

Just had a quick look at Sweeting P157/158 and think the graph is OK. When gamma = 1 we have the Cauchy distribution, which is renowned for its fat tails (leptokurtic).

I also tried a sense check with the PDF on P157 of Sweeting, putting in gamma = 1. I get:

f(x) = (1/β pi) {1 + [(x-α)/β]^2}^-1

This looks like it has power decay (heavier tails) whereas the normal distribution has exponential decay (lighter tails).

Is this OK?
Anna
 
Okay thank you for this Anna, so just to confirm (heavier tails/leptokurtic) distributions produces more extreme events than the (lighter tails/platykurtic) distributions? Think I may have been missing this point?
 
Hi Johann, yes, leptokurtic distributions typically have a fatter tailed / thinner peaked PDF than a normal distribution would have. This means that it assigns higher probabilities to extreme events.
 
Back
Top