• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Solution 23.12

A

ActStudent1405

Member
Applying the Black-Scholes option pricing formula to the value of an equity share, should r be defined as the expected increase in X0 rather than the continuously compounded risk free rate?
 
No, I don't believe so. r is the risk-free rate as normal in the BS model. The company growth rate (ie increase in X) is irrelevant as the model is risk-neutral.
 
Thanks Simon. Paul Sweeting’s book in section 14.5.3 (pg 358) applies the Black-Scholes model to estimate the probability of default at time T. E is substituted for B (value of the bond) and r (risk-free rate) for rx (the expected increase in the current value of the asset). Does this mean that this formula and the one in solution 23.12 are referring to different things? I was linking the two as the sentence preceding Question 23.12 states that the Black-Scholes formula will be applied to the value of the equity shares.
 
Hi. The growth rate and the volatility are connected (higher expected growth implies higher variability). Intuitively you can either consider the growth rate as the risk-free rate with a 'normal' level of volatility, or have a 'real' expected growth rate with a higher sigma reflecting the additional risk in pursuit of higher growth than the risk-free.
 
Back
Top