A
Adithyan
Member
I had been through chapter 21 (Capital modelling and allowance for diversification) in ST7. I have put the page no. and the paragraph from the page.
I have highlighted the lines that didn't make sense to me.
Kindly help me with these.
I have put my question in italics and highlighted below the paragraph from the book.
1.3 Allowing for the cost of allocated capital for pricing ( Page in book 10)
For expanding or contracting portfolios, the capital needed to support the
reserves that would be held until all claims from the specific underwriting year
are fully paid may differ from the reserve risk component of the allocated capital.
This would be based on the size of the total reserves brought forward.
My question: I don't get the meaning of the sentence in bold in the paragraph above.
2.2 Assessing correlation (Pg in book 15)
Two alternative approaches are for us to consider causes and effects to assess
the key drivers of correlation, or to consider the likely scenarios in which the
particular risks will occur at the same time.
A cause and effect reasoning considers the underlying logical links between different
events, using for example, scientific theory. For example, the risk of a tidal wave of a
certain magnitude can be assessed using flood models, and then the effects of that tidal
wave on the land can be assessed using mapping techniques
My question: Could you tell me how cause and effect reasoning helps in finding correlation?
These were the stuff that hindered my understanding of the chapter. Kindly assist.
Thank you in advance for the help!
I have highlighted the lines that didn't make sense to me.
Kindly help me with these.
I have put my question in italics and highlighted below the paragraph from the book.
1.3 Allowing for the cost of allocated capital for pricing ( Page in book 10)
For expanding or contracting portfolios, the capital needed to support the
reserves that would be held until all claims from the specific underwriting year
are fully paid may differ from the reserve risk component of the allocated capital.
This would be based on the size of the total reserves brought forward.
My question: I don't get the meaning of the sentence in bold in the paragraph above.
2.2 Assessing correlation (Pg in book 15)
Two alternative approaches are for us to consider causes and effects to assess
the key drivers of correlation, or to consider the likely scenarios in which the
particular risks will occur at the same time.
A cause and effect reasoning considers the underlying logical links between different
events, using for example, scientific theory. For example, the risk of a tidal wave of a
certain magnitude can be assessed using flood models, and then the effects of that tidal
wave on the land can be assessed using mapping techniques
My question: Could you tell me how cause and effect reasoning helps in finding correlation?
These were the stuff that hindered my understanding of the chapter. Kindly assist.
Thank you in advance for the help!