1. Posts in the subject areas are now being moderated. Please do not post any details about your exam for at least 3 working days. You may not see your post appear for a day or two. See the 'Forum help' thread entitled 'Using forums during exam period' for further information. Wishing you the best of luck with your exams.
    Dismiss Notice

A 2017 Q2

Discussion in 'SP8' started by jonathans, Aug 26, 2017.

  1. jonathans

    jonathans Member

    upload_2017-8-26_11-4-36.png
    upload_2017-8-26_11-4-50.png

    Could someone please explain part 2?

    Thanks!
     
  2. Hemant Rupani

    Hemant Rupani Senior Member

    Ouch! very fewer marks for this odd question.

    Understanding given information:-

    Let Y= aggregate loss cost, and \( x_i \)= loss from \(i^{th}\) case in the period of coverage
    Note: a case could be an individual loss or a loss from individual event, not given in the question. That won't alter the answer anyway.
    So, \(Y=\Sigma_i max(x_i-1000000,0)\)
    Now, table is given for \(LEV_Y(Aggregate~Limit) \)
    Note: here LEV is based on absolute numbers rather than relative to EML/PML.

    there are 2 implicit assumptions in the given answer that I could think of.
    1) \( x_i <= 2000000 \) for any i. Otherwise, that loss will be uncovered before any reinstatement occur. Or, maybe it is possible to allow for a loss in the layer before and after reinstatement in part.
    2) there is no payable reinstatement allowed. Otherwise, calculations are not straightforward.
    Answers:
    a)

    from unlimited free reinstatements - there is no aggregate limit
    from AAD - first 1000000 will be reduced that would otherwise be counted as the final loss
    So, LEV(Unlimited)-LEV(1000000) or E(Y)-LEV(1000000)=1289000-350000=939000
    b)
    from 1 free reinstatement - the aggregate limit is twice of the given loss layer.
    So, LEV(2000000)=525000
    c)
    from AAD - first 1000000 will be reduced that would otherwise be counted as the final loss
    would be counted as the loss is answered in 'b)'
    So, LEV(2000000)-LEV(1000000)=525000-350000=175000

    PS: I don't know how the first alternative to 'c)' is calculated. maybe, they took Deductible as aggregate excess besides case excess.
     
    jonathans likes this.

Share This Page