• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

unweighted arithmetic indices

R

r_v.s

Member
An unweighted arithmetic index is unsuitable because the performance of any investment portfolio will reflect the actual weights – ie market capitalisations – of the constituent investments held within that portfolio, which are unlikely ever to be equal

This may sound silly! But I've not be able to understand this sentence clearly.
Would you plz explain?
 
An unweighted arithmetic index is unsuitable because the performance of any investment portfolio will reflect the actual weights – ie market capitalisations – of the constituent investments held within that portfolio, which are unlikely ever to be equal

This may sound silly! But I've not be able to understand this sentence clearly.
Would you plz explain?

this statement is very simple. It says that when we are measuring the change in any index over time, the calculation of the change will be correct only if we take the changes in every component of the index, and multiply them by the respective weights(here the relative size of that component in that index), and then sum all such component specific weighted changes. When we take simple average, we are assuming that the weights are all same, while actually they never are
 
Back
Top