In the example question, it is mentioned that for single premium version, supervisory reserve is bound to be positive. Why is it the case? Whereas for annual premium version, it mentions that loadings included would offset the the initial loss by reducing the reserve and in theory it could be negative but won't be due to regulatory requirements being that negative reserves are not allowed.
So, for annual premium policy, loadings included could lead to negative reserves being held? But for single premium contract, where all the premiums are paid upfront, why are reserves bound to be positive?
So, for annual premium policy, loadings included could lead to negative reserves being held? But for single premium contract, where all the premiums are paid upfront, why are reserves bound to be positive?