• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Experience Analysis in Life insurance

V

Varsha Agarwal

Member
For mortality analysis in life insurance, Actual/Expected(A/E) is generally greater than 100 percent in first policy year. Can someone give any kind of explanation for this kind of trend?
 
For mortality analysis in life insurance, Actual/Expected(A/E) is generally greater than 100 percent in first policy year. Can someone give any kind of explanation for this kind of trend?


Basically, at the time of product designing, we are using older IALM tables, 2006-08 or 1994-96, which causes us to expect deaths according to those tables. But, actual deaths are not according to any table. They are what they are. So this makes the actual deaths more than the expected ones, which makes A/E greater than 100%.

This is my understanding. In case you have any other logic or explanation, please do share.

Regards,
Shyam
 
Back
Top