• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

SP7 April 2023 Q4iii

M

Minh Ho

Very Active Member
When asking about a commutation agreement between insurer and reinsurer, the answer said:
Insurer would likely take a more optimistic view of the final settlement value of the claims resulting in a lower premium for itself

is this statement untrue? because when settling the commutation, the reinsurer should be the one who pay the insurer. Because the reinsurer received the reinsurance premium upfront, and when the contract ends, they have to "refund" to insurer.
Reinsurer will have optimistic view about future claims, so that they can pay less when insurer will have prudent view about future claims so they get paid more.
Let me know your thoughts?
Thanks
 
Hi Minh Ho

Your understanding of a 'traditional' commutation arrangement whereby the reinsurance contract is terminated with the liabilities remaining with the insurer and a commutation payment being made by the reinsurer to the insurer is totally correct.

However, this particular question stated that the extended PA liabilities were being commuted to the reinsurer, so instead the liabilities would be transferred to the reinsurer in return for a payment being made from the insurer to the reinsurer.

The examiners recognised that the question could have been interpreted either way, and credit was given for both options. This is discussed in the ASET.
 
I have the same understanding as you do.
However, I gave this question to some reinsurance professionals, giving both understandings (commute to the reinsurer or traditional commutation), they think the answer are weird.

They said that “commute to” does not mean transfer all risk to insurer. Why don’t the IFOA use the term “loss portfolio transfer” or “run off”?
 
Commutations, LPTs and run-off are used throughout the Core Reading in various ways (and in some cases in the Principal Terms). Given that is what the IFoA has written and is examined, I would stick wherever possible to that, although in practice the examiners may accept alternative valid definitions. If you have any comments on the setting of the IFoA exams, you'd have to contact the IFoA as we have no involvement in that process I'm afraid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top