• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Kurtosis CMP Chapter 6

T

TryingHardToPass

Member
On page 32, there is a box which mentions that "a distribution with a high kurtosis is called 'platykurtic', a distribution with low kurtosis is called 'laptokurtic', and a distribution with medium kurtosis is called 'mesokurtic'."

Google definition seem to suggest that the definition in the CMP notes are reversed (i.e. The term “platykurtic” refers to a statistical distribution with negative excess kurtosis. It has fewer extreme events than a normal distribution.) Which is the correct definition?

Thanks in advance
 
Sorry another question on the same chapter:

For Question 6.2, the formula to apply to change measure is:
\[E_Q[X_t|F_s]=\frac{1}{M_s}E_P[M_tX_t|F_s] \]

Where does the \[\frac{1}{M_s}\] come from? Page 6 of Chapter 6 mentions that the way to change probability measure is:
\[ E_Q[C]=E_P[\frac{dQ}{dP}C]\]
 
On page 32, there is a box which mentions that "a distribution with a high kurtosis is called 'platykurtic', a distribution with low kurtosis is called 'laptokurtic', and a distribution with medium kurtosis is called 'mesokurtic'."
Hi
Thanks for pointing this out. Leptokurtic definitely refers to having higher kurtosis. I'll make sure this is corrected in the next edition of the Course Notes.
Thanks again.
 
Where does the \[\frac{1}{M_s}\] come from?
Check out page 68 of Baxter and Rennie - the full explanation is given there. Briefly, \(M_t\) represents the change in the measure up to time \(t\), but because in Question 6.2 we're conditioning on \(F_s\) we really only want the change in measure between time \(s\) and time \(t\); this is given by \(M_t/M_s\). Since \(M_s\) is known at time \(s\) it can come outside of the expectation operator.
Hope that helps.
 
Check out page 68 of Baxter and Rennie - the full explanation is given there. Briefly, \(M_t\) represents the change in the measure up to time \(t\), but because in Question 6.2 we're conditioning on \(F_s\) we really only want the change in measure between time \(s\) and time \(t\); this is given by \(M_t/M_s\). Since \(M_s\) is known at time \(s\) it can come outside of the expectation operator.
Hope that helps.

Thank you so much Steve for the reference. The explanation was quite intuitive as well, really helpful
 
Back
Top