• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Ch 08 Tax Page 7

A

Aman

Member
Companies may have different policies on how they allow for tax on capital gains and losses. This could be due to taking a practical approach to some of the complexities of the tax calculation, or due to alignment of different policies when books are amalgamated. Many companies take a simplified approach in practice and consider the taxation of each unit fund assuming that it is the only fund run by the company. Therefore, for example, losses in one fund are considered usable only against gains in that same fund, even though there is actually no such ring-fencing in the company’s overall tax assessment.

Hi - I quite did not understand the above paragraph, especially for any inference. Please can someone help me with a one-liner conclusion?
 
Companies may have different policies on how they allow for tax on capital gains and losses. This could be due to taking a practical approach to some of the complexities of the tax calculation, or due to alignment of different policies when books are amalgamated. Many companies take a simplified approach in practice and consider the taxation of each unit fund assuming that it is the only fund run by the company. Therefore, for example, losses in one fund are considered usable only against gains in that same fund, even though there is actually no such ring-fencing in the company’s overall tax assessment.

Hi - I quite did not understand the above paragraph, especially for any inference. Please can someone help me with a one-liner conclusion?
HI Aman
Are you able to be more specific on what you are unclear about?
Thanks
Em
 
Back
Top