Bharti Singla
Senior Member
Qus. 1 (iii) A proprietary life insurance company writing significant volumes of with profit business had recently undertaken an analysis of embedded value profit. It was observed that the lapse experience on its with profits business was significantly higher than assumed.
Explain the likely impact on the Embedded Value of the higher than expected lapses on its with profit business.
Ans. I am pasting few lines of the solution in which I need clarity:
'Based on the higher lapse experience, the insurer may further decide to change the reserving basis in its PVFP calculations. If the reserving basis is modified to allow for the impact of higher lapses, it would result in higher reserves, lower net assets, higher PVFP but possibly lower EV'.
This would happen as the increase in PVFP would be lower than the reduction in net assets under traditional embedded value approach as the risk discount rate is expected to be higher than the assumed projected investment return.
My question is:
Why the company would increase the reserves if lapse experience is higher than expected? Is it because of the fact that lesser policies will contribute now to the overhead/expenses? Also, company may have saved some reserves on the extra policies lapsed, and if there is no or little benefit payable to the policyholders lapsing the policies, then the company may use this extra reserves to meet its liabilities. Can anyone please elaborate?
Explain the likely impact on the Embedded Value of the higher than expected lapses on its with profit business.
Ans. I am pasting few lines of the solution in which I need clarity:
'Based on the higher lapse experience, the insurer may further decide to change the reserving basis in its PVFP calculations. If the reserving basis is modified to allow for the impact of higher lapses, it would result in higher reserves, lower net assets, higher PVFP but possibly lower EV'.
This would happen as the increase in PVFP would be lower than the reduction in net assets under traditional embedded value approach as the risk discount rate is expected to be higher than the assumed projected investment return.
My question is:
Why the company would increase the reserves if lapse experience is higher than expected? Is it because of the fact that lesser policies will contribute now to the overhead/expenses? Also, company may have saved some reserves on the extra policies lapsed, and if there is no or little benefit payable to the policyholders lapsing the policies, then the company may use this extra reserves to meet its liabilities. Can anyone please elaborate?