I don't think you're being criticised due to this problem.
It's obvious to everyone that a lot of students will be impacted. There's a chance that everyone who fails CT1, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 8 next time could be impacted. All to different scales though. And some of them won't be impacted at all, and some may face a slightly easier future on paper.
Good. I appreciate that you agree and thanks for your support.
So there is agreement that people will be impacted. Out of the 10,000 students, it’s likely that 6,000 will be impacted. We can put a reasonably certain estimate on this.
I also understand that if you haven’t got CT1 and 5 you get an easier ride in the new system.
This is why it is unequitable.
The IFoA can come up with a number for this in their Defence, but at the end of the day it doesn’t matter, the offending statement is that current students wouldn’t be disadvantaged. It doesn’t matter if some have an advantage. It doesn’t negate the fact since the IFoA and actuaries have to understand these are real people and not just some statistic. This is probably why our pension pots have black holes.
There was a very simple solution which the IFoA chose not to follow. Probably since they thought they could make some money out of it (I have some evidence on this too)
The IFoA could have just kept the exams seperate. There was no point to join them up for no reason whatsoever.
If my CT1 and CT6 exams were not being rendered worthless and I had to do three new exams with updated content I would have no complaint.
The question is what should now be done?
I have made mistakes on exams and I have failed and accepted this. I don’t think I have ever even asked for a remark, which probably I should have done given some of the things I’ve seen on here. I have had to sacrifce my personal holidays and pay money from my own pocket for exams akin to a fine for my failure.
What are the IFoA going to do for causing this fiasco?