• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Standard formula

V

Viki2010

Member
Hi, just a couple of questions on the topic:

1. How is the 99.5% calibration performed? Is that the last stage of scr calculation after obtaining an scr figure from standard formula?

2. Concentration risk in market risk - is that the same as contagion risk? Does it apply to sa2 products?
 
The stress tests that the company has to perform under the standard formula are calibrated to the 1 in 200 year (99.5%) event level, so once you have performed them you have already taken into account the appropriate confidence level.

I tend to think of concentration risk as being related to lack of diversification within a portfolio (so higher volatility of outcomes) and contagion risk as being about the more systematic risk which spreads an economic shock from one part of the financial services sector to another, or one part of the economy to another, or one country to another (or whatever). Any company with assets and investments is potentially exposed to either type.
 
I tend to think of concentration risk as being related to lack of diversification within a portfolio (so higher volatility of outcomes)

So if most of the company's assets are invested in corporate bonds (say), the concentration risk SCR would be much higher than under a scenario where it's asset portfolio is well-diversified, right? Would the company even need to hold this SCR if it's portfolio is well-diversified?
 
So if most of the company's assets are invested in corporate bonds (say), the concentration risk SCR would be much higher than under a scenario where it's asset portfolio is well-diversified, right?

Not necessarily, if they are well-diversified within the corporate bond portfolio.

Would the company even need to hold this SCR if it's portfolio is well-diversified?

Possibly not: it depends on whether any individual counterparty exposure exceeds the limits set out by EIOPA. The concentration risk sub-module of the SCR standard formula basically applies stress factors to the excess of a single counterparty exposure over stated thresholds. However, you are not required to know about the detail of this approach as it is not covered in the Core Reading.
 
Back
Top