Quoting from their notes Nov 18 :
A discussion on third marking followed. It was agreed that further clarity was required. There were expectations that a whole script was remarked, but it was identified that this was not always the case. Examiners could in fact review or remark only one or two questions where there were significant variances, may remark the complete script, or may review the complete script. Any reviewing or remarking of scripts was confirmed as being performed by the Principal Examiner or a similarly experienced examiner in the subject team. The Principal Examiner may also standardise the initial marking to normalise any variations to ensure that no candidate is disadvantaged prior to any third stage moderation. It was explained that at this stage the Principal Examiners have the authority to apply their academic judgement to determine who a competent candidate is. Such candidates will demonstrate they have competency in the concepts and principles of the subject.
A question was asked around the CA3 exam which was the initial examination of concern and it was explained that both CA2 and CA3 were still being worked through. However on the initial exams reviewed there were no major concerns.
It was agreed that in the light of these discussions the IFoA would revise the content of the Student Handbook on the marking process as part of its commitment to transparency.