First of all I don't think much of the 'coincidence' explanation you had received earlier from them.
I suspect that my result in February will turn out similar - a stronger mark & pass in Q2 but overall average failing to meet their pass mark. For Q1 I would ask how much the markers awarded you for the graph you made and how many marks were going for that & ask how the pass mark increased when there was less time to write 600 words due to the graph requirement.
Just from a layman's perspective how can you be getting 80% in Q2 then get way less in Q1? I don't think it's your communication skills that fluctuate that much between morning and afternoon. It's about time they told us what THEY are doing when it comes to marking Q1. It's about time Acted find out and coach us accordingly.
It's clear to me marker 1's marking should be investigated as his/her mark for Q1 has caused a fail here. I mean, if marker 1 hasn't marked other people's Q1 then it could be you've failed and others have passed because other people luckily avoided this sad marker!!!
Last edited by a moderator: Dec 5, 2016